Staff Writers
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 14:22
IT Industry -
Market
Page 2 of 3
Many countries restrict incumbents from owning both cable and traditional fixed-line telephone networks.
Moreover, in a range of countries, the fixed-line incumbent does not
also own the largest mobile carrier, as is the case in Australia.
The Government intends to correct Australia’s unique and highly
integrated market structure by preventing Telstra from acquiring
additional spectrum for advanced mobile services unless it structurally
separates, divests its HFC cable network and divests its interests in
Foxtel.
The legislation provides scope to remove either or both of the cable
network and Foxtel requirements if Telstra submits an acceptable
undertaking to structurally separate.
The measures will promote competition across the different delivery
platforms while providing Telstra with the flexibility to choose its
future path.
The Government’s clear preference is for Telstra to submit an
undertaking to voluntarily structurally separate that is acceptable to
the ACCC.
The Minister will provide guidance to the ACCC to assist its assessment of these matters.
Importantly, the Government retains an open mind on how structural separation may be achieved.
For example, it may involve the creation of a new company into which Telstra could transfer some of its fixed-line assets.
Alternatively, it may involve Telstra progressively migrating its
fixed-line traffic to the NBN over a period of time and under set
regulatory arrangements, and for it to sell or cease to use its
fixed-line assets on an agreed basis.
This approach will ultimately lead to full structural separation over time.
Such a negotiated outcome would be consistent with the wholesale-only,
open access market structure to be delivered through the National
Broadband Network.
The Government has commenced constructive discussions with Telstra on
how NBN Co and Telstra could work collaboratively towards the NBN.
And I want to congratulate the new leadership at Telstra, Catherine
Livingstone and David Thodey, for the very constructive way they have
approached these discussions.
CONTINUED