Peter Dinham
Wednesday, 25 March 2009 20:32
Datamonitor report that since the emergence of the first significant wave of financial crime detection and prevention programs, costs have far exceeded expectations, and besides the technology expenditure, the total cost of experienced technical and non-technical compliance and anti-fraud experts has significantly increased.
The survey found that the cost was quite often spread over many different business functions, such as operations, compliance, risk and security, and may also overlap with processes that are embedded in regular business practices, such as payment processing or credit risk analysis.
As such, Datamonitor found, banks may be unable to hold a single unified view of all the associated costs related to anti-money laundering or anti-fraud activities, preventing them from making efficient decisions regarding how best to direct their resources to focus on the major areas at risk of financial crime.
Knapik concluded that there was a growing opportunity for business and technology consultants or vendors that could improve a bank’s understanding of the full range of anti-financial crime related processes which existed across the entire organisation, and further implement all the necessary enhancements to the existing process.
Think again. Most businesses only have PART of a DR plan - and this spells business disaster in the event of an IT disaster.
Download The Seven Sins of Disaster Recovery White Paper now and find out how you can prevent this happening to you.