Technology news and Jobs
Information Technology News
Slow digital TV takeup is no surprise
Information Technology News
Slow digital TV takeup is no surprise | Slow digital TV takeup is no surprise |
|
| by Stephen Withers | |
| Thursday, 15 February 2007 | |
I'm not at all surprised that only one-quarter of Australian homes have digital TV tuners. I'm more surprised that three-quarters of those have an HD tuner.Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
Unless you can afford a fairly big set, does HD really do that much for you? And that reminds me - as Adam Turner mentioned - sport is one of the 'naturals' for HD. But so many of the flat-panel sets I've seen just can't keep up with the often rapid panning that is common to much sports coverage, and the jerky blurring of the background distracts from the action. Similarly, PVRs are a lot more expensive than VCRs. Yes, they do have several advantages, including higher picture quality and no messing with tapes, but you're talking serious money. I doubt I will buy another VCR, but I'm not going to prematurely scrap the one I have in favour of a PVR. I'm also curious whether the Digital Broadcasting Australia figures that Adam quoted tell the whole story. Were they just for set top boxes, PVRs and built-in, or do they also include digital tuners connected to computers? I wouldn't claim that the people I know are a cross-section of the community, but a lot of them seem to be using USB tuners so they can watch and record TV on their computers. But when all else is said and done, the longer you leave buying a piece of electronic gear, the cheaper it will be. If a digital tuner of a certain quality costs $200 today, it'll be $150 or maybe even $100 next year (and you've had the benefit of the cash in the meantime). To my mind, it's only sensible to put off going digital until your current equipment needs replacing. And that is the piece of the story that the Federal Government keeps getting wrong. It responds to the relatively slow takeup of digital by pushing out the deadline for switching off analogue transmissions. If I'm still going to receive analogue until 2012, isn't it more sensible to replace a dead TV with a relatively cheap analogue set now, safe in the knowledge that when it needs to be replaced a high-def model is likely to be affordable?{moscomment} |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|





Tags




