| Microsoft versus FairUse4WM test case for DRM |
|
| by Stan Beer | |
| Thursday, 28 September 2006 | |
|
Page 2 of 2 If a user has downloaded a few hundred iTunes tracks at a cost of hundreds of dollars and decides that he wants to swap his ageing iPod for an iRiver, a Creative Zen or a Sandisk Sansa, Apple and the law as it stands says he can't. To be sure, there are ways around this but they're not legal. Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
It is quite understandable that companies like Apple and Microsoft want to create and protect their markets. Apple in particular has done a lot to foster the growth of legal digital downloads. Most would agree that iTunes is a great service and the iPod is a great portable player. However, the notion that iPod's sales and market domination depend entirely on the iTunes connection is probably invalid. Most iPod owners have hundreds if not thousands of tracks on their players. Yet sales statistics tell us that on average, each of the 60 million plus iPods in the marketplace has only 20 tracks purchased through iTunes. iTunes probably aids iPod sales more through promotion than DRM lock-in. Governments in Europe, led by France and the Scandinavian countries have now begun to dig in their heels and say enough is enough. They have targeted Apple and Microsoft is likely to be next. Limiting consumer choice is not what free enterprise is supposed to be about and that is exactly what DRM attempts to do. As for the Microsoft lawsuit against the FairUse4WM developers, the best thing the case could do is highlight the DRM issue in the public arena and motivate lawmakers to rethink current laws and make FairUse4WM redundant.{moscomment} |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|



Tags



