|
Censored Google damned if it does |
|
|
by Stan Beer
|
|
Thursday, 08 June 2006 |
Global media watchdog, Reporters without Borders has directed harsh criticism at search engine leader Google for its acquiesence to the Chinese Government, which the media organisation indicates has stifled the free flow of information in China.
In January this year, Google launched a special censored version of its
search engine for the Chinese market at Google.cn. The censored version
filters out words which are not approved by the Chinese regime.
Prior to the launch of the Chinese language Google.cn, most Chinese web
surfers were able to access Google.com, which had been freely
accessible since 2002 due to international pressure on the Chinese
Government. However, since the launch of Google.cn, recent reports say
the Government has once again blocked access to Google.com.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin originally defended the company's
decision to enter China with a censored version of its search engine in
an interview with Reuters in January, saying words to the effect that
some information is better than none. Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, went
further in an interview with Associated Press, unashamedly defending
the company's actions saying: "I think it's arrogant for us to walk
into a country where we are just beginning to operate and tell that
country how to operate."
The decision was attacked by human rights and freedom of information
organisations such as Amnesty International and Electronic Frontiers
Foundation. This week Brin told Reuters that only 1% of Chinese users
accessed Google.cn with the rest going to Google.com.
However, if the reports of the difficulty accessing Google.com within
China are correct, then 99% of Chinese looking for freely accessible
information are no longer visiting Google at all. Reporters Without
Borders place the blame squarely at Google's feet claimiing that the
launch of Google.cn had emboldened the Chinese Government to reinstate
the bar on accessing the global Google site.
Google, however, is far being the only company that appears to have
compromised western values of freedom of information in order to gain
access to the lucrative Chinese market. Both Microsoft and Yahoo have
been the recipients of similar criticism from human rights groups in
recent times. Yahoo has been accused of helping the Chinese authorities
track down dissidents, while Microsoft has reportedly self-censored a
blog. {moscomment}
Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
|