
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs
Cornered!
Structural Separation: Conroy's second big surprise
Cornered!
Structural Separation: Conroy's second big surprise | Structural Separation: Conroy's second big surprise |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Tuesday, 15 September 2009 | |
The legislation announced today by communications minister Stephen Conroy goes further than most of the industry had expected "I keep checking that the date isn't 1st April" one CE commented). It's the second big surprise the minister has pulled out of the hat this year.Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
In late May the Australian telecoms industry was treated to the rare sight of a shadow minister coming out in support of the shadowed: shadow communications minister, Nick Minchin, issued a press release headed: "Structural separation of Telstra not supported by Labor or the Coalition." He said it was clear that neither the Rudd Government nor the Coalition was advocating the structural separation of Telstra. To support his claim that Labor was not in favour of structural separation Minchin provide an extract from the Senate Estimates Hansard in which he grilled Conroy on the question and where Conroy said that this was option was not canvassed in the regulatory reform discussion paper. This came at a time when the issue of structural separation was headline news with Optus busy lobbying on the basis of its regulatory reform submission advocating structural separation. I analysed the Government's regulatory reform discussion paper and concluded that, while structural separation was mentioned, it was not seriously considered to be an option. In fact what Conroy said in the Estimates hearing is, after a fashion, has now delivered: Minchin asked: "You are not prepared to rule out structural separation?" To which Conroy replied: "It is not in the [regulatory reform discussion] paper. I do not believe I have ever advocated it. Telstra may volunteer it. Who knows? …." Well that's pretty much where we are today: if by volunteer, you mean Telstra has been made offer it cannot refuse.
This article first appeared in ExchangeDaily, iTWire's daily newsletter for telecommunications professionals. Register here for your free trial.
![]() |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|






Tags





