Cornered!
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL

Blog

Technology news and Jobs arrow Cornered! arrow Structural separation: on the cards or not?
Structural separation: on the cards or not? E-mail
by Stuart Corner   
Thursday, 04 June 2009
Then, crucially, only two options are listed: "Option 1—Strengthening the current operational separation regime that applies to Telstra," and "A further option open to Government would be to introduce a stronger form of separation, such as a functional separation regime similar to those introduced in the United Kingdom and New Zealand, and being considered as a regulatory remedy within the European Union," There is no mention of "legal" or "structural" separation.

However it is not true that structural separation is not canvassed: the question is listed as one to which responses are sought, but in a somewhat qualified manner. "What are the appropriate structural arrangements for Telstra during the transition to the National Broadband Network?" (my italics). What exactly do they mean by that? Structural changes are major and permanent, not something put in place for a transitional period.

There's no shortage of material in the discussion paper detailing the faults of the current system, and little to indicate how greater functional separation would solve these without adding even further weight to the heavy regulatory oversight that has so patently failed to achieve its goals to date. So it is not hard to interpret the paper as a sign that the government is heading at least towards legal separation.

Is the Government perhaps unwilling to spell out the 'S' word but hoping that the regulatory reform process will lead to at least legal separation as the inevitable and only solution to the problems so clearly spelt out in the discussion paper? Perhaps it is hoping that the mere threat of legal or structural separation and a Telstra free NBN will persuade Telstra to take the initiative and start down the road to greater separation.
This article first appeared in ExchangeDaily, iTWire's daily newsletter for telecommunications professionals. Register here for your free trial.
Register for ExchangeDaily


Powered By Joomla Tags

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to post your comment!



 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
iTWire user statistics Visitors last 30 days
694,279
Subscribers 15,210
#1 independent technology news advertise here
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff

- Advertisement -

Featured Whitepapers

Cornered! - Telecoms blog
Cornered! is a blog on all things tele-communication from the perspective of one who has observed, analysed commented and reported on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition).
Follow iTWire on Twitter

About iTWire

iTWire is all about technology news, information, jobs and community for the IT and telecommunications industry professional. Subscribe to our free ICT daily newsletter