Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs 
Cornered! Minchin marshals survey results to attack $43B NBN plan
Cornered! Minchin marshals survey results to attack $43B NBN plan | Minchin marshals survey results to attack $43B NBN plan |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Wednesday, 15 April 2009 | |
|
Page 2 of 2 Minchin also cites a separate study by Charles Sturt University: Household Technology Survey, which saw data collected from around 700 households nationally in August '08. According to Minchin, "It found that 67 percent said higher speed broadband "is not a priority in our household budget [and] Only 11 percent of households said they were certain or almost certain to upgrade to a higher speed broadband service over the next 12 months, despite 55 percent saying their households could afford to do so. The same survey found that just 18 percent felt the Federal Government's broadband initiatives would help their household."Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
But not only did the Blueprint fail to spell out a clear vision of how this important goal was to be achieved, it could not even set a goal in terms of the desired or needed speed. Instead, it came out with this classic cop-out. "Neither industry nor government can say precisely what the 'real' broadband of tomorrow will be...With ever-increasing consumer demands one thing is certain; what may constitute real broadband today will not be considered real broadband tomorrow...Real broadband can be characterised as whatever speed is required to meet the needs of the various markets for broadband...Real broadband as a concept cannot be used as a target—it is a value ascribed by individual consumers and limited by where we sit on the technology continuum today—not where we will sit tomorrow." The means by which this uncertain goal of Real Broadband were to be achieved were equally uncertain. Read my comments at the time and you will see what I mean. At least with Labor we have definite goals, and even if they cannot be justified by demand metrics we have the satisfaction of knowing that most of the developed world has come to the same conclusion and is pursuing similar goals. And, so what if they are overly ambitious: better that than being too modest. Plans are not set in concrete; they can be changed, delayed or abandoned altogether if technology, market demands or other factors change dramatically. Better these than no plans at all. |
Tags
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
