VIRTUALISATION
Alarming increase in Aussie households’ telco costs, according to AAPT survey | Alarming increase in Aussie households’ telco costs, according to AAPT survey |
|
| by Staff Writers | |
| Thursday, 19 February 2009 | |
|
Telecommunications provider, AAPT claims a survey just released reveals an “alarming” increase in the telco costs of Australian households.
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
According to the survey, 35 per cent of the 1,000 households surveyed nationally confirmed they were spending more on telco costs than they were a year ago, with more than one third citing mobile and internet services as the reason for the increased costs. Shannon said the research results highlight the significance of technology costs for Australian households and the importance of shopping around for the best deals. “It’s becoming clear that Australians don’t consider broadband and mobile phones discretionary purchases – these are increasingly deemed necessities and households are struggling to keep up with home telecommunications costs. “Interestingly, despite the surge in monthly expenditure more than 50 per cent of households rarely or never consider telecommunications offers to assess if they’re on the best deal for their needs,” Shannon added.
The AAPT survey also revealed that 65 per cent of households said they found it somewhat difficult or very difficult to compare offers, while the reluctance to shop around and assess offers increased to approximately two thirds of households among the 55 years plus group.
On a state-by-state basis, AAPT says the survey found: • Households in Victoria and Tasmania are more likely than other states to have experienced an increase in their monthly mobile spend. • Queenslanders are more likely to restrict the time they or their household spends on the phone or internet to keep telco costs down, than those in other states (42% vs 35% nationally) • South Australian households are more likely to monitor their household’s internet usage to keep telco costs down (44%) |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|





Tags




