Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL
 |
 Stephen Withers turns his gaze on the world of Apple, with
detours into other aspects of IT and communications as they catch his
attention. |
Technology news and Jobs 
Our Blogs Core Dump Apple shareholders propose, directors oppose
Our Blogs Core Dump Apple shareholders propose, directors oppose | Apple shareholders propose, directors oppose |
|
| by Stephen Withers | |
| Friday, 09 January 2009 | |
|
Page 3 of 4 The penultimate proposal is backed by more substantial shareholdings. While it is being made on behalf of an individual that owns just 84 shares, it is co-sponsored by the New York City Office of the Comptroller (over 2 million shares) and the Green Century Equity Fund (7950 shares).Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
The board asserts that this is unnecessary as "The Company’s commitment to increased transparency regarding its social and environmental practices is evidenced by the reports and other data available on the Company’s website". It's interesting to note that while the directors pointed to assertions that Apple was on track to eliminate PVC and brominated flame retardants (BFR) from products by the end of 2008, the company has been taken to task by Greenpeace for failing to meet that goal in the 17 in MacBook Pro, the first hardware release of 2009. Apparently the MacBook Pro itself is both PVC and BFR free, both substances are still present in external items such as the charger and cables. And finally there's a proposal from the AFSCME Employees Pension Plan (owner of over 21,000 shares) for a UK (or Australian) style shareholders' advisory vote on executive compensation. (The AFSCME is the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the country's largest public employee and health care workers union.) "We believe that existing U.S. corporate governance arrangements... do not provide shareholders with sufficient mechanisms for providing input to boards on senior executive compensation," says the proposal. A widespread criticism of the processes generally used to set executive compensation is that they typically involve comparisons with similar companies, and then the argument is made that compensation should be above average to reflect the presumed above average performance of the company's own executives. Which companies does Apple consider to be its peers when it comes to executive compensation? Please read on. |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
