
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs
Cornered!
What if Australia held a broadband party and nobody came?
Cornered!
What if Australia held a broadband party and nobody came? | What if Australia held a broadband party and nobody came? |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Tuesday, 21 October 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 3
Delivering its latest dose of vitriol in the increasingly vicious slanging match over the national broadband network, Telstra has branded the Optus 3G network a "laughing stock". But it is Australia that is fast becoming the laughing stock of global telecommunications with the government being held to ransom by opposing forces and erstwhile participant AAPT/Telecom NZ stirring up trouble from the sidelines.Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
He is simply saying the equivalent of what Telstra has been saying for months: that if the government does not agree to the NBN being built on Telstra's, terms Telstra will invest its money elsewhere; most likely in competing infrastructure in Australia, but CEO Sol Trujillo has suggested overseas investments as a possibility. However for his comments Telstra has branded O'Sullivan as "the true bully of Australian telecommunications." Telstra spokesman, David Quilty, claimed that: "If it was serious, SingTel Optus, whose parent is majority owned by the Singapore Government's sovereign wealth fund, could put an end to this farce today by making the necessary financial commitment to building the National Broadband Network. Of course it could, just as Telstra could have done three years ago. But Telstra consistently claims it is safeguarding its shareholders' interests because the regulatory conditions are not right to enable it to make a decent return on such a massive investment. Yet when Optus suggests that its parent might apply the same standards when deciding where to invest its shareholders' funds - with many burgeoning Asian markets to choose from - it is branded a bully. And on top of all this we have Paul Broad, CEO of AAPT - an erstwhile partner in the Optus-led Terria consortium expected to bid against Telstra to build the national broadband network - doing a splendid 'the-emperor-has-no-clothes' act and asking whether we really need this broadband network that the Rudd Government is desperate to spend $4.7 billion dollars of taxpayers money on. Broad was reported in The Australian today saying "We have got to come clean and say, does this investment really stack up?...We have ADSL 2+ out there today in metro Australia and consumer demand is not such that we have been stretched to the eyeballs... Rather than have this debate through a bidding process, there should be an independent, non-aligned body - and the Industry Commission would be a good place to start." Hear, Hear. CONTINUED |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|










