Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL
 | |
|
Technology news and Jobs 
The Linux distillery Smack, crack, hack and track any network with Linux (not Windows)
The Linux distillery Smack, crack, hack and track any network with Linux (not Windows) | Smack, crack, hack and track any network with Linux (not Windows) |
|
| by David M Williams | |
| Saturday, 04 October 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 2   
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
My colleague and good buddy Alex Zaharov-Reutt has noted that pretty much all open source software, while possibly developed primarily by Linux users, comes in a Windows flavour too. I guess the Linux philosophy does encourage sharing. So, I said “Linux has a great IM client,” and Alex said, “Yep, it’s available for Windows too.” I said “Linux has a great RSI-prevention package,” and Alex said, “Yep! Windows does too.” So I said, “Gaylords say ‘what’” and Alex said ... ok, maybe I have paraphrased a little. Alex does make a good point. It’s one thing to compare open source software against proprietary competitors and argue that Linux gives you a wealth of software for free, but the strength of that argument is diluted if the same options are also available to Windows users. Granted, Linux makes it easier – OpenOffice and Dia, for two examples, are pre-bundled with most Linux distros. Even if they’re not, Linux has a dead simple package management system which lets you easily find, download and install these pieces of software. It will also keep all your software up-to-date with one command instead of having to manually check each item for new releases. However, a “Linux vs Windows” argument on open source applications (the operating system is a different matter) really becomes a platform-independent “open source vs proprietary” argument. That’s where working with sharp-minded colleagues like Alex is great; it keeps you on your toes and makes you think harder how to make a robust point. But I think I’ve done it. I’m sure you’ll tell me, dear readers, and Alex too, if I’m wrong. However, I know Windows is crippled on this topic so I’m pretty confident. Hacking. Cracking. Two words which are often used interchangeably for activities largely considered nefarious. These terms aren’t synonymous however. Nor do they even necessarily share the same skillset. Both may seek to circumvent limitations but hackers are interested in how things work. Crackers are seeking malicious intent or personal gain. On the corporate side, circumventing security isn’t always a bad thing. There is a legitimate field known as “penetration testing” which is company-sanctioned hacking and cracking into its own infrastructure – to find what’s weak before the bad guys do. Linux is rife with top-notch tools to aid in the penetration testing process. Windows even has a motza of tools too. But quantity isn’t the thing here. It’s quality. Let’s check out why Linux has it all over Windows in this area. CONTINUED |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
