Technology news and Jobs 
Information Technology News Google data retention policy battered by EU
Information Technology News Google data retention policy battered by EU | Google data retention policy battered by EU |
|
| by Davey Winder | |
| Wednesday, 10 September 2008 | |
  
When it comes to privacy issues, Google has been badly bruised in the last couple of years. Much of the verbal media battering coming as a result of its policies over data retention. Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
Hardly surprising that this did little to satisfy the privacy watchdogs and activists. After all, that's a whole year and a half where search data is connected to the IP addresses within server logs before that connection is broken and the data properly anonymised. The in April, the EU Article 29 Working Body recommended that Google, and other search engines, should not hold this data for any longer than six months. This EU data protection advisory body made a point of writing to Google and directly questioning the privacy practise and policies it has. The response it got was not enough, and they went on record to say that Google had no sufficiently explained the requirement for storing and processing personal search data for so long. Then, in July, we had the notorious 'All your YouTube viewing data are belong to us' controversy after a judge order Google to hand over server logs containing the personal data of millions of YouTube users to Viacom. Finally, it would seem, Google has had enough of the bad press and decided to move a little further along the road to doing the decent thing. It is now going to cut the storage period before anonymisation of personal search data by half to nine months. This, apparently, being as a result of understanding that user privacy is fundamental to earning and keeping user trust. Well, duh! The next fundamental step will be explaining, in terms non-marketing droids can understand, just why it needs to keep IP data, search queries and related information in a way that identifies the user at all. And I am afraid that the usual rubbish about improving services and fighting terrorism will not do... |
Tags
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
