| Google Chrome: not faster, safer or smaller after all |
|
| by Davey Winder | |
| Thursday, 04 September 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 4 Only cave dwellers will have missed the arrival of the Google Chrome web browser client. Right from the get go there has been something of an assumption that this will be a better browser. But how do those assumptions stand up to some real-world testing where Google Chrome is faced with the kind of questions that actual users, rather than marketing types, are keen to know the answers to? Let's start with the big issue of small size. "We designed a browser window that is streamlined and simple" Google says, but how streamlined is it when placed under the test microscope? Google Chrome is the "fattest of them all" says one researcher after running a 10-site, multi-tab scenario test across IE7, IE8 (Beta 2), Firefox 3.01 and Google Chrome. This test is designed to benchmark the memory footprint of the browser clients, an important metric when talking about 'size' as a practical browsing consideration. The results were not what the testers were expecting and they admit that they discovered "it is Google Chrome, not Internet Explorer 8, that is the true memory consumption leader." Now that is quite some statement to make, so how is it backed up? Well the test pretty much mimics real-world intensive browsing usage. It opens up an assortment of 10 popular websites, including some very media heavy ones, in separate tabs. So how did Chrome actually fare in terms of memory consumption, what were the figures? We also examine how safe Chrome is in the real world, all on page 2... CONTINUES |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|

TAG 




