Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL
 |
 Stephen Withers turns his gaze on the world of Apple, with
detours into other aspects of IT and communications as they catch his
attention. |
Technology news and Jobs 
Our Blogs Core Dump Apple wants to take Psystar and its clone customers to the cleaners
Our Blogs Core Dump Apple wants to take Psystar and its clone customers to the cleaners | Apple wants to take Psystar and its clone customers to the cleaners |
|
| by Stephen Withers | |
| Thursday, 17 July 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 3   
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
The copyright claims appear to revolve around Psystar's factory installation of Mac OS X on its own hardware. Since use on "non-Apple-labeled" hardware is not permitted under the licence, copying the operating system from the DVD to the hard disc could e construed as making an unauthorised copy. Selling the computer would be the distribution of an infringing copy. Similarly, selling Mac OS X with Psystar hardware (even if copies of the operating system had been purchased through legitimate channels) can be seen as inducing, causing or materially contributing to copyright infringement by purchasers. What about breach of contract? Apple claims to have been informed that Psystar installs Mac OS X on the computers it sells directly from the original disc that is subsequently supplied to the customer, in which case it has breached the licence agreement that it agreed to by breaking the seals and installing the software. The claim of trademark infringement seems a bit of a reach to me. As far as I can see Psystar has only used Apple's trademarks to identify Apple products, but Apple claims they have been used in a way "likely, if not certain to deceive or cause confusion or mistake among consumers". Are Apple and its lawyers trying it on? I think so, and I'll explain why on page 2. |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
