Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL
The Linux distillery
Bringing the world of Linux to you, David cuts through the tech and shows you how it works and how to use it, in terms that apply to any distro. RSS
Technology news and Jobs arrow The Linux distillery arrow The new wave of Linux Lite – lean, mean and green
The new wave of Linux Lite – lean, mean and green E-mail
by David M Williams   
Thursday, 26 June 2008
Like the gPC the Eee was cheap, but was a subnotebook and an extremely light one at that making it highly desirable. Regular readers will know the Eee flew off the shelves. It became hard to get for a period as demand outstripped supply. ASUS declared this a huge sales success and have subsequently expanded the line with further models.

Let’s just back up a bit. When I say the gPC was cheap you ought to read into it that the components were low-end. We’re talking 512Mb RAM, an 80Gb hard drive, a 1.5GHz processor and other comparable parts. Similarly, the Eee came with 512Mb RAM, a Celeron processor and a minute 4Gb of disk space (but that disk space is flash memory, not a traditional hard drive with a spinning platter.)

These low-priced components meant that the machines in which they were housed could never ever claim to be a workhorse, but, heck, they were cheap. This can’t be emphasised enough; the computers weren’t going to run Crysis with all graphics options set to max, but they sure could compose a mean bit of word processing and really were smokin’ when it came to spreadsheets and were costed inoffensively enough such that a bit of impulse buying never really met with regret.

One driver that kept costs down was bundling a Linux distribution as the operating system and thus preventing any Windows licensing hitting the end-user and pushing the price up. In the case of the gPC it was Ubuntu; in the case of the Eee it was an ASUS-customised version of Xandros Linux. If ASUS began the Eee’s life with their Windows XP variant it would likely not have been successful – being pushed up a price point and then having to compete with low-end “regular” notebook computers that boasted much more usable screens and hard drives.

The types of people who purchased these systems were normal folk. Not everyone was a self-professed geek who was going to be comfortable recompiling the kernel to be sure required device driver modules were supported. They were, for the most part, end users who wanted to achieve tasks on their computer like read e-mail, search on Google, write letters and look at their digital photo collection.

There have been no widespread reports of Linux causing disappointment. We didn’t check the news the day after these systems got snapped up to find hordes of angry users loading up Microsoft Windows, or revolting over the bundled applications being hard to use or because they felt they didn’t get good value for their money.

The reality was quite in contrast: Linux worked. Computer users could achieve the things they wished to do. The underlying operating system was natural and effective. Linux saw wide scale adoption and usage almost by default, simply because people wanted the systems it so happened to be powering.

CONTINUED







 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
iTWire user statistics Visitors last 30 days
694,279
Subscribers 15,210
#1 independent technology news advertise here
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff

- Advertisement -

Featured Whitepapers

Follow iTWire on Twitter

About iTWire

iTWire is all about technology news, information, jobs and community for the IT and telecommunications industry professional. Subscribe to our free ICT daily newsletter