Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs 
Cornered! Broadband ISPs' performance laid bare
Cornered! Broadband ISPs' performance laid bare | Broadband ISPs' performance laid bare |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Monday, 16 June 2008 | |
|
Page 2 of 3 The second-tier ISPs consistently outperformed the city average, occupying between two and four of the top five places in each centre. MaxNet took second place in Auckland and Wellington, Snap was number two in Christchurch and Compass was second-ranked in Hamilton and Dunedin. A standout feature of Auckland's broadband performance was that four of the top five ISPs were smaller, 2nd tier service providers.Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
However the report notes: "These outcomes must be seen in context. Epitiro-IDC believes a key factor is that small Tier 2 ISPs have relatively uncontended networks with few users at any one time. Many have a dedicated focus on smaller higher-value audiences. By comparison, Vodafone, Telecom, Slingshot and Orcon have much larger and rapidly growing subscriber bases, leading to heavier network loading and contention. This has a particular impact on Telecom, given that it has over 60 percent retail broadband market share. "Another factor is that in the three main centres a number of Tier 2 ISPs were only measured at one central city site, whereas the top five ISPs were measured at three sites including suburbs." Overall, in the March quarter, TelstraClear Cable, TelstraClear DSL and Orcon recorded the top outcomes. TelstraClear took leadership in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch where it has its own cable and DSL network, while Orcon was the top performing ISP in Hamilton and Dunedin. However both service providers had mid to below-average outcomes outside of these cities. Other leading ISPs achieved only average or below average results, and reported a wide variation between their highest and lowest city scores ranging from 20 percent (Vodafone) to 86 percent (Telecom). In Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, Telecom's results were between 26 percent and 32 percent below each city's average. Vodafone and Slingshot both achieved similar outcomes that were consistently mid-range to below average across all cities. This is only the first such report. Epitiro-IDC says the index will evolve to compare results on a rolling quarterly basis and that it will also increasingly provide qualitative insight into ISP investment plans and outcomes, providing the picture behind the data. If only Australia's Communications and Media Authority, or the ACCC, would do something similar. The ACCC's action seems not to have gone beyond threatening ISPs with misleading advertising over speed claims. CONTINUED |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
