Technology news and Jobs 
Our Blogs The BeerFiles Xobni outs Outlook inadequacies
Our Blogs The BeerFiles Xobni outs Outlook inadequacies | Xobni outs Outlook inadequacies |
|
|
|
| by Stan Beer | |
| Tuesday, 06 May 2008 | |
|
From what I've seen of Xobni, it looks to be an interesting tool that will make life easier for Outlook users. However, it will not make me and the many other former Outlook users switch back. The fact of the matter is that Outlook has long ago passed its use-by date. Since transitioning to Gmail and Google Calendar, I would never again consider using a desktop based system like Outlook. Others say similar things about Hotmail, Yahoo Mail and Yahoo Calendar, just in case anyone thinks I'm especially beating the drum for Google. I have a pretty powerful desktop computer with 4GB RAM, a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor and an Nvidia GeForce 256MB graphics card. So when Outlook started keeping me waiting while new emails were loading and folders were synchronising, I naturally got more than a little peeved. An email client shouldn't need a supercomputer to run with acceptable performance. That alone was enough to make me look for an alternative. However, poor performance was by no means the only bugbear. As any traveller who uses a computer while on the road will know, having full access to your emails and calendar is mandatory. It is possible to configure your Outlook system so that you can have access remotely but it's messy and anything but intuitive. Desktop email and calendar clients are simply not made to be shared and accessed from computers other than the one on which they reside. In contrast, since using a Web-based mail and calendar system I have felt a wonderful sense of freedom. I don't even need to own a computer to get access to my emails and appointments. Microsoft beware because the moment Google gets its documents and spreadsheets products up to an acceptable standard, I'm taking my entire office online and I suspect so will many others. Having said all of this, it is true that Web mail clients such as Gmail do suffer from some of the same organisational problems as desktop based clients like Outlook - perhaps even more so. That's why it seems a pity that Xobni is focussing its efforts exclusively on Outlook. With hundreds of millions of Gmail, Yahoo Mail and Hotmail users, there's a ready made market for enterprising plug-in cloud computing developers to emulate desktop-bound Xobni and help us to organise our Web-based information. Or perhaps the young startup Xobni, which has so far refused Microsoft's acquisition advances, is already thinking along those lines itself?
|
Tags
Subscribe to this comment's feed
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
When you sign into Hotmail or Gmail, you just see the summary of each email... you do not get the attachments straight away, which is why you may think it ''seems'' more responsive, but in reality, when you want the attachment on a web-based service, you must wait for it to download, just the same as Outlook.
My opinion? I find my own web based email clients annoying because when you click from one email to the next email, you have to wait for a new web page to load. In Outlook, the shift from one email to the next email is instant.
I think you were a bit unfair in this article, and did not compare the overall pro’s and con’s of both methods. Different people will like different features in each method, and ultimately, it is a personal choice.