Technology news and Jobs 
Our Blogs Open Sauce - A GNU perspective Watch out Red Hat, there's someone following you
Our Blogs Open Sauce - A GNU perspective Watch out Red Hat, there's someone following you | Watch out Red Hat, there's someone following you |
|
|
|
| by Sam Varghese | |
| Saturday, 29 March 2008 | |
|
Page 2 of 2 That's interesting because those of us who've been around in the community for a while have seen more total cost of ownership surveys than we'd care to bat an eyelid at; those from Microsoft say Windows and its brethren are cheaper to run while those from people in the FOSS sphere claim the opposite. It now looks like the cat is out of the bag and perceptions are changing - FOSS is indeed cheaper to use both at a personal and business level but then a lot of FUD has obscured this for a long time. There are other statistics (if only the late Benjamin Disraeli had not made that famous statement!) to back up this - 108 of the participants said that lower acquisition and maintenance costs were among the top three factors that made open source attractive. Once again this is a no-brainer to those of us who have been running FOSS for years and keeping the budget in the black - but to hear it from the "enterprise" is indeed encouraging. Ninety-two participants said freedom from vendor lock-in (ah, we know what that means!) was a significant factor while 97 cited the flexibility of FOSS and the acccessibility to libraries of common code. The percentages that emerged when the participants were asked what companies would command a majority of commercial open source software revenue give no clear indication of what kind of business model will bring in the biggest yields. A little over a third said platform vendors - read Oracle, Sun, IBM - would be the biggest gainers Less than half that percentage opted for companies like Microsoft, Google and Yahoo!. Half the survey participants opined that software as a service would have the greatest impact on software delivery and business models for open source applications and middleware vendors. Virtualisation, which was on the lips of world + dog a year ago, was just about half as hot. Can a start-up vendor hope to enter the business software market with a product that is not open source? Nearly 80 percent said this was not possible now. And when it came to areas which could be most vulnerable to disruption by FOSS in the next five years, web publishing and content management ranked highest followed by social software (ugh!) and business intelligence. But business intelligence (an oxymoron?) also figured in the top answers when participants were asked which sectors of the open source industry would never be disrupted. For the statistically inclined, the complete survey is here . And for the people at North Bridge, a thought to ponder - open source is not just a business model. Red Hat has got so far because it has kept to the straight and narrow and been open about other things as well. I don't think I need to elaborate.
Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
When you subscribe get a 12 months license for LiveProject Valued at $99 USD Comments (3)
  written by Lawrence D'Oliveiro, March 30, 2008
Whoever it is that might be coming up behind, it's certainly not Oracle.
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080327/195124677.shtml written by The VAR Guy, March 30, 2008
I'm a big Ubuntu fan and a user. But can we please keep Ubuntu's momentum in perspective? Canonical is a small, privately held company. It's unclear how much revenue they produce. Red Hat is firmly entrenched on servers and growing nicely during a weak US economy.
The VAR Guy www.thevarguy.com Tell us what you think! better to paste your comment - this page will refresh every 15 minutes
|
Tags
Subscribe to this comment's feed
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
There is a company called Terra Soft Solutions that produces a Linux distribution called 'YDL - Yellow Dog Linux’. This particular distribution is 100 percent compatible with Sony’s Playstation 3. I have installed it and used it... some of the major downsides include: Adobe’s flash player not available, and you might have some problems finding drivers for printers and other peripherals. Other than that, Linux distributions seem to be bulldozing ahead quite nicely compared to what they looked like a few years back... I suggest another 12 months development and many people will be very happy with YDL and UBUNTU (another LINUX distribution) as serious alternatives to Windows. But for now, Windows offers users global compatibility with maximum support from all the world’s software companies.
Cheers! :-)