Technology news and Jobs arrow TAG
OLPC: one virus per child PDF E-mail
by Sam Varghese   
Wednesday, 12 March 2008
It's taken a remarkably short time for the One Laptop Per Child project to change from positioning itself as the saviour of children in developing countries to becoming a toady for Microsoft.

In an interview with Business Week recently, Nicholas Negroponte, the founder of the project, is quoted as saying that the organisation now needs to be managed "more like Microsoft."

And in keeping with this, this modern-day Moses has also said, according to OLPCNews , that Microsoft and the OLPC are in discussion on how to release Windows XP for the XO, the laptop, which the project claims, will "provide children around the world with new opportunities to explore, experiment, and express themselves."

That latter bit sounds like one of the Microsoft ads that screen on free-to-air TV in Australia.

It looks like the good Nicholas wasn't satisfied with providing these unfortunate kids with something with which they were unfamiliar. So he's thought of giving them something which they encounter every day - viruses.

Only this time, it will be Windows viruses. And worms. Plus spyware, scumware, adware and malware. Way to go, Nicholas. If they can't eat bread, let 'em eat cake. Only this time it will come from Redmond.

It also looks very much like Senor Negroponte will be leaving the project soon. He's looking for a chief executive and hopes to have one appointed by April.

OLPC will need to redraft its core principles , especially the fifth and last one which uptil now said "Free and open source". Today, rather appropriately, someone has edited that to read "Free and Open source (unless it's Microsoft)."

This principle has some wonderful prose; permit me to quote a few lines: "A world of great software and content is necessary to make this project succeed, both open and proprietary. Children need to be able to choose from all of it. In our context of learning where knowledge must be appropriated in order to be used, it is most appropriate for knowledge to be free. Further, every child has something to contribute; we need a free and open framework that supports and encourages the very basic human need to express."

Free and open? I'm not too sure that the good folk in Redmond will like that kind of language. Time to change - this site may help the overburdened people at OLPC to draft a replacement in a matter of minutes.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to post your comment!


Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
iTWire user statistics Visitors last 30 days
Suscribers
904,266
13,751
#1 independent technology news advertise here
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff
Subscribe to our free e-newsletter