VIRTUALISATION
Hold the Phone! GSM Encryption is in Deep Trouble | Hold the Phone! GSM Encryption is in Deep Trouble |
|
| by David Heath | |
| Sunday, 24 February 2008 | |
|
For some years, researchers have been able to demonstrate that the primary encryption scheme for GSM phones had “issues.” Presentations in the past week at two major security conferences have turned those issues into an effective hardware solution.
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
The primary encryption standard (A5/1) was reserved for “close friends” of the EU – France, Germany, UK etc and some non-EU countries (USA for instance). The rest of the more friendly nations (those more “friendly” than “hated”) were offered A5/2. A5/3, the strongest encryption of the group was introduced rather more recently. In the late 1990s, confirmed in 2003, A5/2 was essentially broken. There were well-substantiated claims that the encryption could be defeated in around 15 milli-seconds, using hardware current as of 1999. In other words, in-call interception was easily achieved. There have regularly been suggestions that a back-door existed in all implementations of A5/x and was made available to governmental organisations as needed (for instance here). Obviously such suggestions were never confirmed, but since encryption was only ever applied to the wireless component of a call (and any wired component was in plain-text), the point was somewhat moot anyway - the tales of government security access to telco systems are legendary (look them up yourself!). So, enough history, what of the new attack? It’s difficult and expensive, right? Unfortunately, no. David Hulton of Pico Systems and Steve Muller from CellCrypt, the authors of the attack estimate that a system costing only $US1,000 (strangely developed by Pico!) will allow completely passive decryption of a GSM call encrypted with A5/1 in only 30 minutes; spend half a million, and it can be done in 30 seconds, and what government can’t afford that? So, here in Australia, we’ve been secure until now, haven’t we? Unfortunately not; as surprising as it might seem, the “coalition of the willing” does not equate to “friendly” status. We’re stuck with A5/2! Live with it. |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|





Tags




