| Not everybody wants to go to Moon before going to Mars |
|
| by William Atkins | |
| Thursday, 14 February 2008 | |
|
One of NASA’s reasons for returning to the Moon is to practice for longer journeys to Mars. The Orlando Sentinel (Florida) newspaper gives a good account for NASA’s plans to go to the Moon, now over thirty-eight years after Apollo 11 first landed on the Moon on July 20, 1969, with astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. The Orlando Sentinel article is found at: “NASA outlines plans for moon and Mars”
NASA’s plan to return to the lunar surface is based on President George Bush’s New Vision for Space Exploration Program. However, another article by Popular Mechanics magazine questions whether the Moon problem is the best way to prepare for flights to the planet Mars. Please read the Popular Mechanics article "Dissent Grows as Scientists Oppose NASA’s New Moon Mission" Whether we go to the Moon first, before going to Mars, or go to an asteroid, first, the exploration of space should be conducted based primarily on technology, science, engineering, and other such logical factors and not based solely on political agendas.
The benefits of space exploration have advanced the United States in weather forecasting, communications, electronics, medicine, and many other fields of endeavors. Manned space exploration for the United States, as it should be for any country, should be considered seriously for its impact to humanity on Earth and our future both on the planet Earth and beyond it. It should be evaluated on its long-term benefits and not on such short-term ideas as beating someone to a destination.
A steady, well planned out, and safety-conscious program will be much more successful than the “go-stop-go-stop” programs we’ve often had in the past (whether it is in space or down here on Earth).
Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
|
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|

TAG 
Tags




