
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs
Cornered!
Spreading FUD on broadband regulation
Cornered!
Spreading FUD on broadband regulation | Spreading FUD on broadband regulation |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Friday, 08 February 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 3
In the doublespeak of telecommunications politics "no compelling case" to regulate ADSL means it might be imminent and "it is unlikely there is a need to regulate" means "no way will there be regulation". Welcome to the brave new world of ALP telecoms regulation, or Telstra spin-doctoring. Take your pick!
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
If a secret deal has been done, that's bad. If it hasn't, the uncertainty created by the mere suggestion that it has is equally bad. Either way, the Government needs to stand up and set the record straight. In an extraordinary piece of doublethink Irving has interpreted almost identical statements from ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel as meaning the exact opposite of each other. Irving said: "For 18 months now the ACCC has been making statements that it saw 'no compelling case at this time' to regulate ADSL2. Now for those who watch Yes Minister or hear a lot of political speech the phrase 'no compelling case' could be interpreted as 'we think we have got a pretty good case and we are just around the corner from doing something'. Clearly that kind of language is not enough for anyone to make multimillion dollar investment decisions." He then went on to say: "Two things have changed. First the ACCC has changed its position and Mr Samuel now says he considers it unlikely there is a need to regulate... And second is that the government, from the minister, very formally, issued a letter confirming the ACCC's new position and confirming the government's view that it agrees." |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|










