
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs
Cornered!
Alexander Graham Bell found guilty of plagiarism after 130 years
Cornered!
Alexander Graham Bell found guilty of plagiarism after 130 years | Alexander Graham Bell found guilty of plagiarism after 130 years |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Monday, 07 January 2008 | |
|
Page 2 of 3 Gray immediately renewed his legal challenge to Bell which went to the Supreme Court. Again, he was unsuccessful. In 1888 the court found for Bell, claiming there was insufficient evidence to substantiate Wilbur's confession, according to Brooks. Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
Now, after 120 years author Seth Shulman claims to have unsealed those dead lips to discover the truth, which he has revealed in a new book, published today, 7 January and entitled: "The Telephone Gambit: Chasing Alexander Graham Bell's Secret". He says: "while working for a year as a science writing fellow at MIT [I stumbled] upon evidence that reveals a twisted mystery surrounding Bell's role in the invention of the telephone. Working from Bell's laboratory notebooks and his voluminous correspondence...I unearth[ed] a 'smoking gun' that leaves little doubt that Bell furtively - and illegally - plagiarised his initial telephone design from his major competitor, Elisha Gray in his quest to secure what would become the most valuable US patent ever issued." According to reviews of the book, these notebooks were restricted by Bell's family until 1976 and were digitised and made widely available in 1999, here . Brooks, who acknowledges having complete and unprecedented access to the AT&T files, does not appear to have had access to these family papers. However after reviewing Gray's claims and the allegations of plagiarism he concludes that, even if they were proven, the credit for the invention of the telephone still lies with Bell, and not Gray. |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|







