| Universe may have been created with Big Splat |
|
| by William Atkins | |
| Tuesday, 01 January 2008 | |
|
Cosmologist and professor Benjamin D. Wandelt and graduate student Amit Yadav of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (Department of Physics and Astronomy), used data from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite to measure small temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation that still is present today all throughout the universe. Cosmologists contend such radiation was left over from the creation of the universe. They consider CMB radiation to be validating proof that the universe was created as a big bang.
CMB radiation is a form of electromagnetic radiation that completley fills the universe. Specifically, it has a thermal 2.725 kelvin (K) black body spectrum that peaks in the microwave range at a frequency of 160.2 gigahertz (which corresponds to aa wavelength of 1.9 millimeter). For Wandelt and Yadav, when they measured these early universe temperature fluctuations, their results did not agree with the accepted theory. They compared the predicted temperature fluctuations that came from the “single-field slow-roll inflation” theory with the actual measurements from WMAP. They didn’t agree. This disagreement could have important implications on how the universe first formed and evolved.
Most cosmologists accept a simple theory for inflation called “single-field slow-roll inflation.” It states that the universe initially expanded exponentially (accelerated expansion) for its first fraction of a second in a smooth and flat pattern. The mechanism for inflation is not known by cosmologists, but a number of predictions have been made based on observational measurements. Various problems have been brought forth by scientists with respect to the Big Bang theory (the theorized origin of the universe). These scientists are continuing to work out these problems. One of these questions involves the work of Wandelt and Yadav. They may have opened up the possibility of new theories on how the universe was created and developed over time. On the other hand, they may be wrong in their assumptions. As in any piece of new discovery, scientists must confirm or deny the discovery. Cosmologists are now working on just that: whether Wandelt and Yadav have found something valid in how the universe was born. One new discussion that has arisen from their studies, which was stated in the ScienceNOW Daily News article “No Dice for Slow Roll?” (December 21, 2007), states, “Although the findings don't rule out traditional inflation theories, they do open the door for other theories about how the universe began, including the idea that the universe began with a splat rather than a bang.”
Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
|
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|

TAG 
Tags




