Technology news and Jobs 
VIRTUALISATION Jury sides with record labels in file-sharing case
VIRTUALISATION Jury sides with record labels in file-sharing case | Jury sides with record labels in file-sharing case |
|
| by Stephen Withers | |
| Friday, 05 October 2007 | |
  
Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
Many people accused of file sharing by the music industry have opted to settle for a few thousand dollars rather than go through the expensive legal process, but Thomas denied any wrongdoing, saying she did not have a Kazaa account. Having found in favour of the record companies, the jury measured damages at $US9250 for each song. The companies asked for between $US750 and $US150,000 per song. Significantly, the judge had previously ruled that the complainants did not have to show that any song had actually been downloaded from Thomas's computer to another, only that the files had been made available to others. This meant the music companies did not have to establish an actual economic loss attributed to Thomas's alleged actions, even on the doubtful basis that every copy downloaded represented a lost sale. Thomas has also reportedly run up as much as $US60,000 in her own legal costs. The case was clouded by the fact that Thomas's hard drive was replaced after she received a warning from the labels. She asserted that was due to a hardware problem, while the labels inferred an attempt to cover up wrongdoing. Lawyer Ray Beckerman, who is associated with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, described the jury verdict as "one of the most irrational things I have ever seen in my life in the law." "If the Judge doesn't set aside the verdict sua sponte, I expect there to be motion practice to set aside the verdict, based on its obvious unconstitutionality and numerous other reasons, and if that fails I expect there to be a successful appeal", he added in a blog posting. |
Tags
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
