Cornered!
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL

Blog

Technology news and Jobs arrow Cornered! arrow Telstra v Coonan: no smoke without fire?
Telstra v Coonan: no smoke without fire? E-mail
by Stuart Corner   
Sunday, 05 August 2007
Telstra's accusations against communications minister, Helen Coonan,   that the process by which Opel secured close to $1 billion of government funding for broadband infrastructure are not new. Inconsistencies between official statements are not reassuring. Nor is the minister's statement denying any wrongdoing.

Rumours that more money than the initial $600m was available were circulating long before the Opel deal was announced. In a Senate Estimates committee hearing on 24 May, shadow communications minister Stephen Conroy asked Simon Bryant general manager of DCITA's Broadband Infrastructure Branch: "I have seen some media reports that extra money will be included. It would be unusual to put extra money into a process that was nearly completed. Would that affect the probity? Would there be probity issues if a program had extra money included in it?

Bryant replied: "That very question was asked of us by a number of the participants. We indicated at the time that the budget was up to $600 million. We indicated that it would always be a matter for government to provide further funds once an assessment stage had been reached and we advised people who wanted some advice on the matter that the best way to approach it would be to put in modular bids...beyond $600 million if they wanted to."

Then, in June with the Opel deal common knowledge in Canberra but not publicly announced, the ALP called for an investigation by the Auditor General , saying "It has been suggested that some participants were advised of the possibility of increased funding under Broadband Connect Infrastructure Program weeks before other participants."

The resulting report, from the Australian National Audit Office, subsequently cleared DCITA of any breach of probity, but details of this, posted on DCITA's website conflict with the responses given by Bryant to Conroy's questioning.

 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
iTWire user statistics Visitors last 30 days
694,279
Subscribers 15,210
#1 independent technology news advertise here
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff

- Advertisement -

Featured Whitepapers

Cornered! - Telecoms blog
Cornered! is a blog on all things tele-communication from the perspective of one who has observed, analysed commented and reported on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition).
Follow iTWire on Twitter

About iTWire

iTWire is all about technology news, information, jobs and community for the IT and telecommunications industry professional. Subscribe to our free ICT daily newsletter