
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL Blog
Technology news and Jobs
Cornered!
Government gears up to spend yet more on rural comms
Cornered!
Government gears up to spend yet more on rural comms | Government gears up to spend yet more on rural comms |
|
| by Stuart Corner | |
| Tuesday, 26 June 2007 | |
|
Page 1 of 2
Communications minister Helen Coonan has just announced plans to spend $1 billion of taxpayers' money to bring high speed broadband services to 99 percent of the population by mid 2009, but she's not going to stop there, and Opel Networks could be in prime position to get almost half as much again in three years time.Featured Whitepaper
5 Best Practices for Smartphone Support
The Government's implementation of the recommendations from these three yearly independent reviews will be funded from the interest earned on the $2 billion Communications Fund, enshrined in legislation with the passage of the T3 Telstra sale package. Coonan claimed that "The Communications Fund is vital to the future of regional and rural consumers. This fund will provide around $400 million every three years to assist in the provision of state of the art services for regional areas." When she announced Opel as the winner of close to $1 billion of Australia Connected funding, she said: "Beyond 2009, this new scaleable national network will have the capacity to provide vastly increased speeds as Australia's demand for bandwidth grows, with funding already assured from the ongoing income stream provided by the Government's $2 billion Communications Fund." This comment seems totally out of order, to suggest that one provider is already earmarked to receive a large amount of government money for projects that should properly be put out to open tender. |
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|










