Cornered!
Cornered! is a blog devoted, most of the time anyway, to telecommunications: local and global issues, technology, people and trends from the perspective of someone who's been reporting, analysing and commenting on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition). Sometimes serious, sometimes flippant, sometimes frivolous. Controversial, analytical, informative, amusing, but never boring; a vehicle for examinations of important issues and observations on my encounters and experiences in an industry where polarised views and hyperbole are the norm.
Follow the Australian Telecommunications scene NEWSLETTER- FREE TRIAL

Blog

Technology news and Jobs arrow Cornered! arrow Gov't's WiMAX choice raises many questions
Gov't's WiMAX choice raises many questions E-mail
by Stuart Corner   
Monday, 18 June 2007


I also recently interviewed Mikael Halen, director government and industry relations with Ericsson, a company which has abandoned all work on WiMAX infrastructure in favour of HSDPA and its successor.

He made the point that "Going forward we believe there will be more mobile broadband than fixed broadband...We are now at 3.6Mbps [with HSDPA]....Next year we will see the first 28Mbps networks and 40Mbps at the end of next year."

To upgrade a 3G cellular network, he said required: "No more base stations: just a software upgrade and more processing power in the base stations," and he added: "Just around the corner 2009 we will have LTE this will take us above 100Mbps."

Today data on cellular networks is expensive, but this could be more a commercial decision than a cost driven decision, and Halen suggests the latter, citing a European 3G operator that started offering unlimited mobile broadband at 3.6Mbps for 20 euro per month. In the first 10 weeks it traffic increased four fold. And he said: "Half a year ago they positioned HSDPA as a complement to fixed broadband. Now they are going after the fixed broadband services which cost to 30-40 Euro per month. You save 20 and get mobility."

I certainly don't have all the answers. This is clearly a very complex question, but it seems to one to which the Government has given scant consideration. As with FTTN, it is picking a technology and bragging about it. Instead, it should have specified service parameters, coverage areas and rollout schedules and evaluated all offers against these parameters in a technology-neutral manner and in a full transparent manner.

Like FTTN, this smells like another politically expedient quick fix which we may all come to regret.{moscomment}

Powered By Joomla Tags

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to post your comment!



 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
iTWire user statistics Visitors last 30 days
694,279
Subscribers 15,210
#1 independent technology news advertise here
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff

- Advertisement -

Featured Whitepapers

Cornered! - Telecoms blog
Cornered! is a blog on all things tele-communication from the perspective of one who has observed, analysed commented and reported on the industry since the dark ages (BC - before competition).
Follow iTWire on Twitter

About iTWire

iTWire is all about technology news, information, jobs and community for the IT and telecommunications industry professional. Subscribe to our free ICT daily newsletter