Blog
Technology news and Jobs 
Our Blogs Open Sauce Dell and Ubuntu: deal or no deal?
Our Blogs Open Sauce Dell and Ubuntu: deal or no deal? | Dell and Ubuntu: deal or no deal? |
|
| by Sam Varghese | |
| Friday, 27 April 2007 | |
|
Page 1 of 2
having some new ideas to address those constraints." Quite a mouthful. But the fact is he can't admit to having talks with Dell, else the article he wrote, justifying that company's reaction to the mass request for Linux on Dell machines, would be interepreted as being the work of a shill. A little bit of history for the casual reader: in March this year, Dell invited the public at large to send in ideas about what products they wanted from the company. This was because the computer maker had lost its position as number 1 to HP and the board was sufficiently worked up to ask the founder to come back and head the company. It made Dell look "customer-focused." (Yeah, I have a stock of weasel words at the ready.) The masses got in on the act and an overwhelming number suggested that Dell offer Linux as an option on its machines at the point of sale. But then Dell started doing the customary fan dance which many companies do at the time when customers make inconvenient suggestions; a host of weasel words were used to skirt the issue. The response said the company could not give its customers what they asked for (never mind that people would buy these products) because there were too many distributions of Linux and Dell did not want to settle on any one as it would end up not catering to those who wanted other distributions. Brilliant. And also quite stupid. Then Shuttleworth came up with his piece that supported Dell's weasel words. I reacted by casting reasonable doubt on most of his assertions. (As a side note, it's interesting to point out that any time one writes something that is negative about either Ubuntu or Shuttleworth, there are a bunch of fanboys who jump on the writer and use every tactic in the book - even racial epithets - to try and distract people from the facts on offer. Such people believe that the defence in a case should prove a man innocent; they do not go by the ancient laws of justice which say the prosecution should prove a man guilty while the defence only has to prove reasonable doubt. There are lots of such intelligent individuals around.)
|
| < Next story in category | Previous story in the category > |
|---|
