IT NEWS     Sustainability    Get JOB ALERTS that match your skills
Technology news and Jobs arrow Information Technology News arrow US senators propose adult web site labels
US senators propose adult web site labels PDF E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
by Stephen Withers   
Friday, 13 April 2007
A pair of US senators have proposed legislation requiring the labelling of web pages considered "harmful to minors" - despite the fact that a similar law passed a decade ago was knocked back by the Supreme Court.

There are two main problems with this proposal. Firstly, there is the broad issue of freedom of speech - something Americans and their judiciary take very seriously.

Secondly, there is the practical problem of requiring all web sites to review all their content, "a task that would be extremely burdensome" according to a US District Court that heard a challenge to the 1996 Communications Decency Act. That court's decision was subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court.

So even if the new Cyber Safety for Kids Act makes it into law, it seems unlikely that it would survive a legal challenge.

Such labelling wouldn't be much use unless web browsers actually supported it. While the major browsers would very likely implement the feature if the law was passed, it would be most surprising if we didn't quickly see an unofficial Firefox build that ignores the label. Combine that with the modifications that allow Firefox to run from a USB drive, and the attempt to provide parents and teachers with peace of mind has failed.

Another problematic part of the proposed act requires web site operators intending to offer content "harmful to minors" to inform ICANN of the fact when registering the domain. ICANN has shown a distinct reluctance to get involved with content classification.

In any case, the law would only apply to organisations located in the US, leaving adult sites in other countries unaffected.

This appears to be a case of politicians feeling they must be seen to be doing something, even if their proposals are unconstitutional or ineffective. Co-sponsor Mark Pryor said "if we sit back and do nothing to protect kids on the Internet, the problem will only escalate," but that doesn't mean that these proposals will actually do anything about the problem.{moscomment}

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to post your comment!


Get stories like this delivered daily - FREE - subscribe now
 
< Next story in category   Previous story in the category >
  •   *  
  • Search
  • AdvSeach
  • Login
  • Events
  • FreeStuff
Subscribe to our free e-newsletter
First name:
Last name:
Your email address:
Your role:
Your industry:
Australian state:
Country:
Enter the security code shown:
mandatory
Contact , Register , Advertise with iTWire , Links , About iTWire , Feedback , Post your jobs , Events , iTWire site map , Start Blogging , MyBlogLog page
Industry Releases , Submit your release now