<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Firefox 3 Beta 1 is a winner</title>
		<description>Comments for Firefox 3 Beta 1 is a winner at http://www.itwire.com , comment 1 to 20 out of 20 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.itwire.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:48:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>FF 2 addons</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-5119</link>
			<description>/quote John
EVERY ONE of these features is already in Firefox 2. What is he talking about?
end quote John/

/quote Shaun
What? No they aren't...
end quote Shaun/

All of the features listed by John are available in ff2 as addons, but they are not an integral part of the program.  It would be a little dumb for the programmers not to merge the features of the most popular addons. - Troy</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:52:23 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re:John</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4587</link>
			<description>What? No they aren't... - Shaun Rosten</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:22:17 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What?  Same as Firefox 2</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4584</link>
			<description>1 one click &quot;bookmark this page&quot; star icon in the location bar, 
2 ability to save tabs (very handy when you need to quit Firefox), 
3 ability to add tags to bookmarks for later sorting, 
4 page zooming 
  
  EVERY ONE of these features is already in Firefox 2.  What is he talking about?  
  
   - John Atkeson</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:22:57 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Opps</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4559</link>
			<description>I mean IE6. Sorry for the typo :d - Krishnan</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:39:47 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>XP has IE! No?</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4558</link>
			<description>/Quote
with all those pirated copies of xp out there, there are also a lot of people not able to upgrade to ie6
End Quote/

I think XP comes with IE7.
 - Krishnan</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:39:12 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memory hole..</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4553</link>
			<description>Not only is the memory hole not fixed yet, it's worse. I had it hit 300,000k in a matter of minutes! 

 They still have a long way to go. I don't care how many extra bells and whistles they throw on to this thing, if they don't fix the memory hole, none of those fancy window dressings will matter.  - Anonemyeouse</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:53:37 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Funny, I tried the beta</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4551</link>
			<description>And had to uninstall immediately. Within 2 minutes of use the browser would eat up my memory to 800meg usage. I'm a huge firefox fan, but that is unacceptable. I don't know why it does that, nor how to fix it. But it is a beta, so I can only hope it's fixed by actual release. BTW this is on Windows XP SP2. But it seems to be the same problem as the openSuSe user above me. Haha, just read his post further, and yeah I've NEVER had any memory problems with previous releases before either, strange it starts now when most people have experienced better memory usage. - Shaun Rosten</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:26:14 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>linux@i686</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4547</link>
			<description>I tried the beta1 on my pentium3-opensuse10.3 and it would gobble up about 500 mb ram and 80% cpu after sitting at the homepage for 10-15 seconds. Same thing after mv'ing .mozilla to .mozilla.bak and letting it build it's own ~dir. But I guess that's why they call it beta. I'm still planning on upgrading when the official release comes out. I've never experienced any of the &quot;memory leak&quot; problems I've heard about on this old hardware, using firefox since the first release. - Stu</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:07:07 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ie6</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4546</link>
			<description>with all those pirated copies of xp out there, there are also a lot of people not able to upgrade to ie6 :D - xenu</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:39:12 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>IE 6</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4541</link>
			<description>It may not be that they won't upgrade, it's that they can't. Win 2000 users can't upgrade to IE 7. Thankfully I don't care because I use Firefox. I'm planning on downloading FF v3.1b as a separate install soon. - Joshua Harris</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:32:13 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Firefox 3 on Mac Leapard</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4540</link>
			<description>I am a Safari user, but I am giving Firefox another look since the new beta. I like what I see, the new prototype mac theme is very safari like. Also the Memory consumption issue seems to be solved. There a few minor things that need work, but they will be fixed i am sure. So far very stable for a beta. - paulw</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:37:13 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Firefox is very stable on Linux</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4538</link>
			<description>I've tested firefox 3 on Ubuntu as well as OpenSuSE and this new version seems to be very stable and fast . - Aliov</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:28:26 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Firefox 3 is stable on Linux</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4532</link>
			<description>I am currently running firefox 3 on fedora and it is stable enough for prime time use. It also loads and works faster than the previous version. - Jst4Fun</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:09:57 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mac, leopard</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4530</link>
			<description>Some problems with the search field, you can search only once then it freezes. - nolihc</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:39:56 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I third the Linux test</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4529</link>
			<description>As no real man(or woman) runs Vista. - BmnRocks</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:23:14 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FF   Linux = yay</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4528</link>
			<description>I've been running the firefox nightly builds on linux for the past month.  I'm pleased to report that it now uses your gtk engine's controls for form widgets.  No longer are we stuck with the messy widget replacement hacks or ugly, boxy buttons.  Additionally, they're working a new Tango theme for the Linux 3.0 final. - MrS</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:17:39 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Firefox on Linux</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4527</link>
			<description>I'm running Firefox 3 alpha (that´s what I found in the Ubuntu repos)
There's a nice visual refresh on the way so Firefox looks pretty much like a part of the system now. There's still a few visual glitches but it looks well overall. Also, Javascript no longer slows the browser to a crawl, so I can confirm that there's the same speedup on Linux - maybe even greater because the Linux version of Firefox 2 was slower than the Windows one. Now it's so fast I can't spot the difference.
 - Peterix</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:02:06 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Here here!</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4522</link>
			<description>I second the request for an Ubuntu or any Linux test! - Mark P.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:51:12 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@Which OS did you test on?</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4515</link>
			<description>I'm sorry but I've only tested it on Vista so far. I plan to give Kubuntu a try tonight. My experience with the Firefox 2 has unfortunately been that it runs slower on Ubuntu/Kubuntu. I'll be interested to see how FF3 Beta 1 performs. - stan</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:51:35 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Which OS did you test on?</title>
			<link>http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15460/1023/#comment-4514</link>
			<description>Which OS did you test on, Stan? I'm asking since many Linux users blame the Mozilla Corporation for treating their OS as an afterthought. It would be wonderful news for us if your positive comments here applied to the Linux version. - Sridhar Dhanapalan</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:54:30 -0600</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
