No. 1 Story

ACCC clears Optus to scrap HFC network and use NBN instead

The ACCC has cleared, provisionally, the proposed deal between Optus and NBN Co under which Optus is to be paid around $800m to shut down its HFC network and transfer customers onto the NBN. read more

Related Articles

How, free, free, Speech, beer, the, Googleplex
New Zealand business software company Greentree's partners with Christchurch-based clients have had a busy...
If you are one, or have one lurking in a bedroom right now, it...
Flippantly, one might say 'very quickly,' but in reality Monash University researchers are leading...
Optus has stolen a march on Telstra - the long time Australian leader in...
The third coming of the Jesus phone has come at last, with the masses in...

How free is free? Speech vs. beer at the Googleplex

Business IT - Technology

In the past few days, Google has been sued by a French mapping software company for making Google Maps available for free and (gasp) without advertising.

Competing with 'free' has always been a difficult prospect, although many have succeeded – Microsoft Office, for instance has done a very adequate job against Open Office.

As I have written previously (Stuff yourself silly - how much free lunch can you cope with?) there is nothing free on the Internet, although the source of funding may not always be obvious.  So it is with Google. 

Google has a vast source of income derived from advertising on its search engine pages.  This money can be used to fund a variety of software projects, none of which need necessarily produce any significant income.  They do, however serve the purpose of enhancing the Google brand and encouraging users to search for content via the Google search engine.

The secret here is "incremental cost."  The cost to Google of serving just one more search request; just one more Gmail account; just one more map request is infinitesimally small.  Once the infrastructure is paid for, the ongoing use costs very little (per user).

For instance Chris Anderson, editor of Wired Magazine and author of the book "Free: The Future of a Radical Price" noted that "This use of Free is part of it's "max strategy" — it uses Free to get its products in the hands of the greatest number of users, and then figures out some way to get money from them (mostly with ads, but sometimes with "pro" versions of the services, in which users can pay for more storage or features, using the "freemium" business model)."

Now, Google would want us to mentally equate both meanings of the word 'free' here – speech and beer.  The power to present the applications they see fit and the ability to charge as little (or as much) as they wish.  But what happens when these worlds collide?