No. 1 Story

HP job cuts loom for Australian employees

A number of Australian employees of Hewlett-Packard are facing the loss of their jobs as the global computer giant looks to slash its worldwide workforce by up to 30,000.

read more

Related Articles

Microsoft, eases, Vista, virtualisation
Although 90 per cent of all servers are yet to be virtualised, Microsoft believes...
Sun has rolled out a major update to the open source and commercial versions...
An increased interest in virtualisation at the application layer has led GLiNTECH, a professional IT services...
As soon as Microsoft Office 2007 for Windows started appearing on corporate desktops, users...
Hitachi Data Systems Corporation, the only provider of Services Oriented Storage Solutions, today announced...

Microsoft eases Vista virtualisation

Business IT - Technology

Mac owners planning to run Windows Vista under virtualisation software such as Parallels Desktop or VMware Fusion have previously been forced by Microsoft's licensing terms to buy one of the more expensive versions.

While Windows Home Basic or Premium might have been perfectly adequate for their needs, an artificial licensing restriction ruled out those options. Not that Apple's operating system was singled out - the clause also applied if you wanted to run Vista under a Windows-based VM product such has Microsoft's own VirtualPC or a bare-metal virtualsation system such as VMware's offerings.

Microsoft officials previously justified the clause by suggesting it was to protect home users from their own lack of sophistication when it came to security issues. That always seemed hollow to me, as the company was happy to take the extra cash from home users that were prepared to buy Vista Ultimate or Business. (The Enterprise edition also allowed virtualisation.)

Last June, Microsoft was set to reverse its policy but the change was vetoed on the eve of its announcement.

Since that time, Parallels and Fusion have grown in popularity among the Mac community.

Whether the 'no virtualisation' clause actually stopped anyone running Home Basic or Premium in a VM is anybody's guess. My suspicion is that quite a number have been doing it.

That said, Windows XP is generally more popular as a guest operating system as it is more tried and tested, and less resource hungry. The higher levels of security provided by Vista would likely be welcomed by Mac users seeking  a second OS to run certain applications.

Apple recently relaxed its licence terms so that Mac OS X Server - but not the regular desktop version - can be run under virtualisation.