The Government has offered Australia's three mobile operators, and vividwireless, renewal of their existing spectrum allocated on 15 year licences in the late 90s and early 2000s at set prices, while the Government expects to rake in $3 billion.
read more
Stan Beer
Saturday, 23 June 2007 08:46
One could argue that with 100 million iPods in the market, Apple already has a ready made market for the iPhone. However, Jobs' vision is clearly to break new ground and create a new business, not simply to replace iPods with iPhones. Therefore if the iPhone is going to succeed it must be able to stand on its merits in the tough mobile phones space, where cost conscious consumers upgrade to new models every year or two for nothing up front.
Would I be prepared to pay the local equivalent of US$499 or US$599 up
front on a two year plan for iPhone? If it's as good as Apple makes
out, maybe. Will I do it again two years from now, when my current
model is long in the tooth? Maybe. Then again maybe I would give
something else a try. At the end of the day, it's just a phone.
Of course, as far as Apple is concerned, iPhone is not just a phone. It
is also an iPod and a mobile Internet device. At present, the iPhone is only 2.5G. It's hard to see the iPhone
succeeding in Europe or elsewhere unless 3G models are released.
Meanwhile, users will need to be confined to Wi-Fi hotspots if they
want acceptable Internet performance. Compare that to the 3.5G N95
which can even act as a fast wireless modem for laptops. The iPhone is
after all a mobile communications device. Rather than touting its Wi-Fi
capability, the question is why should it need Wi-Fi?
Having had five minutes to play with an iPhone at Macworld, there's no
doubt that there's a lot to like about Apple's new baby. However,
unlike the new device going on sale June 29, the iPhone I held in my
hands had a plastic screen. If the old adage "if it ain't broken don't
fix it" holds true for Apple like everyone else, one must ask what was
broken about the tough plastic screen that forced Apple to use optical
glass instead?
Last week I dropped my nothing up front Nokia 6280 3G phone for about
the sixth time since I've had it. As I was getting out of my car, it
slipped out of my hand and hit the concrete sidewalk. As happened on
quite a few previous occasions, the back came off and the battery fell
out. Like always, I simply put the phone back together, turned it back
on and the phone worked as if nothing had happened. The US$499 or
US$599 question is can the iPhone with its non-shock absorbing metal
case and optical glass screen stand the drop test or does it have a
glass jaw?
Loading comments ...

|
Microsoft Office 365Try an easy-to-use set of web-enabled tools for business-class productivity services. Office 365 provides anywhere-access to email, important documents, contacts, and calendars on almost any device. |