Home Business IT Security Survey: 1 in 5 organisations has experienced an APT attack

Probably, the others just don't know that they have.

ISACA, a global provider of information system assurance and security, surveyed over 1,500 security professionals during the fourth quarter of 2012 to find that around one in five reported that their enterprise had been the victim of an advanced persistent threat (APT). Further, according to the survey, 94% of those respondents said that "APTs represent a credible threat to national security and economic stability, yet most enterprises are employing ineffective technologies to protect themselves."

ISACA has released the results of the survey to show that there is a still-growing threat.

"APTs are sophisticated, stealthy and unrelenting," said Christos Dimitriadis, international vice president of ISACA and head of information security at INTRALOT GROUP. "Traditional cyberthreats often move right on if they cannot penetrate their initial target, but an APT will continually attempt to penetrate the desired target until it meets its objective - and once it does, it can disguise itself and morph when needed, making it difficult to identify or stop."

The survey also noted that over 60% of survey respondents thought that it was merely a matter of time before their enterprise was targeted. Contrasting with the 53% who considered that APTs were no different to 'ordinary' threats. These numbers are rather confusing when linked with the fact that around 60% of those surveyed believed their organisations were prepared for an APT incident.

However, more concerning (especially amongst so-called security professionals) was the opinion amongst a vast majority of respondents that antivirus and antimalware along with network perimeter technologies such as firewalls were sufficient protection.

They're not.

"APTs call for many defensive approaches, from awareness training and amending third-party agreements to ensure vendors are well-protected, to implementing technical controls," said Jo Stewart-Rattray, director of ISACA and director of information security and IT assurance at BRM Holdich.

The organisation also calls for the recognition that APTs are entirely different to 'normal' threats. As one security expert recently told iTWire (and we paraphrase), "you're either being hit by APTs, or you simply don't know that you're being hit by APTs."

FREE WHITEPAPER - RISKS OF MOVING DATABASES TO VMWARE

VMware changed the rules about the server resources required to keep a database responding

It's now more difficult for DBAs to see interaction between the database and server resources

This whitepaper highlights the key differences between performance management between physical and virtual servers, and maps out the five most common trouble spots when moving production databases to VMware

1. Innacurate metrics
2. Dynamic resource allocation
3. No control over Host Resources
4. Limited DBA visibility
5. Mutual ignorance

Don't move your database to VMware before learning about these potential risks, download this FREE Whitepaper now!

DOWNLOAD!

David Heath

joomla statistics

David Heath has over 25 years experience in the IT industry, specializing particularly in customer support, security and computer networking. Heath has worked previously as head of IT for The Television Shopping Network, as the network and desktop manager for Armstrong Jones (a major funds management organization) and has consulted into various Australian federal government agencies (including the Department of Immigration and the Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence). He has also served on various state, national and international committees for Novell Users International; he was also the organising chairman for the 1994 Novell Users' Conference in Brisbane. Heath is currently employed as an Instructional Designer, building technical training courses for industrial process control systems.

Connect