Peter Dinham
Tuesday, 07 July 2009 13:35
Business IT -
Security
Page 3 of 3
In a word of advice for companies, McAfee says
corporations should also review policy decisions that are based on
reactions to spam, pointing out that “one-shot policies often ignore
the continuing evolution of spam over the long term,” and that with
spam changes “security effectiveness can erode and actually create a
situation in which a company actually has less security and suffers
from more false-positives.”
“For example, blocking all incoming email from a
particular foreign language without determining whether the email is
from friend or foe may stop a business from getting its next big sale,
partner, or opportunity.”
McAfee says its survey revealed a dominance of spam bounce-backs in the
.com, .org, and .us domains compared with other countries, in which
bounce-backs were insignificant.
“Although spam is international, it seems that spammers prefer to forge
sending domains with these three to a degree out of proportion with the
rest of the globe. Was that choice made maliciously, by convenience, or
by slacking?” questions McAfee.
According to McAfee, spammers appear to understand their customers as
well as or better than the average corporate marketing department,
tailoring their messages and products to what is “most likely to appeal
to a specific audience, and it says, at the same time, spammers are
smart enough to avoid directing traffic to URLs in the countries in
which they operate.
“After all, how upset can a government get if its own citizens aren’t being taken advantage of?”