Davey Winder
Tuesday, 09 June 2009 17:59
Business IT -
Security
Facing up to 70 years in a US prison, self-confessed NASA hacker Gary McKinnon is now getting desperate as extradition beckons.
Between 2001 and 2002, Asperger's Syndrome sufferer and alien obsessed
nerd Gary McKinnon somehow managed to find the wherewithal to hack into
computers belonging to networks operated by NASA, the US Army, Navy,
Air Force and Department of Defence.
Also known as 'Solo' McKinnon has become
something of an unlikely hacker hero. A forty-something former systems
analyst from London who,
according to US prosecutors, was responsible for the
biggest single military hacking exploit the country has ever seen.
Standing accused of causing more than USD $750,000 worth of damage and
costs involved in tracking him down, McKinnon is said to have altered
and deleted files on those military computers leading directly to
critical systems at one US Naval Weapons Station being rendered
inoperable during the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks.
It has been
claimed that
McKinnon was threatened with imprisonment at the now closed down
Guantanamo Bay camp. No
wonder, then, he has been
fighting demands for his extradition
to face those charges in a US court.
Mental health issues have been at the centre of his appeals, with the
legal team surrounding him arguing that extraditing someone with
Asperger’s Syndrome constitutes torture, inhuman or degrading treatment
as defined by the European Convention of Human Rights.
His fight reaches the last stages today as once again his legal team
argue, at the High Court in London, that McKinnon is at risk of
psychosis or even suicide if he were to be taken to the US to face
trial there. It has to be said that his chances of success are slim.
McKinnon has already lost appeals to the House of Lords and the
European Court of Human Rights in his fight against extradition. But
now two senior judges, Lord Justice Stanley Burnton and Mr Justice
Wilkie, must decide if his mental health is in too much peril to allow
the removal to go ahead.
The barristers for McKinnon, Edward Fitzgerald and Ben Cooper, have
said that the decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions not to
prosecute him in the UK as there was no supporting evidence is
"procedurally flawed and unlawful for it wrongly fails to consider and
analyse important expert medical evidence concerning the effects of
extradition on the claimant and his mental health."