The chairman of the Debian technical committee, Bdale Garbee, has cast his support behind systemd. And so has the new member of the committee, free software veteran Keith Packard.
In a post to the Debian technical committee mailing list, Garbee (pictured) wrote: "I think systemd should be our choice for a new default init system for Debian GNU/Linux. Where I think we still need to focus attention is on how to manage the transition, and how to make *any* new init system default for Linux palatable for Debian's non-Linux ports."
And Packard opined: "...on Linux, I believe that the vast majority of Debian users would be best served by encouraging them to use systemd by making that the default."
He also asked the panel to decide on which additional init systems, if any, should be supported.
The choices open to the panel are the existing SysV init system, the Red Hat creation systemd, the Canonical system upstart, and OpenRC.
In December, two members of the technical committee made their positions clear by detailing reasons for supporting different init systems.
Two others on the panel, Colin Watson and Steve Langasek, are both employees of Canonical and are thus not thought likely to support anything other than upstart.
This only leaves Don Armstrong and Andreas Barth. Armstrong has given some indication that he favours upstart while Barth appears to lean towards systemd.
Thus of the eight votes, four appear to be inclined towards upstart, and an equal number towards systemd.
Garbee said in his post that while he had found Sys-V adeuqate, it had never been satisfying. Clinging to such a system while there were technically superior alternatives did not make sense.
He said that while there were things about OpenRC that he found appealing, it seemed too immature to even warrant evaluation.
Thus, Garbee said he had dived in and made a detailed study of both upstart and systemd. While he had not used either on any of the machines that he personally acts as administrator for, he said he had played with both on the virtual machines provided for the purpose.
"It's now clear to me that systemd is technically superior as an init system to upstart. I find the dependency approach easier to think about and work with, unit files seem quite easy to craft and read, I like the status reporting and logging tools, and I find myself agreeing more with Russ that with Ian about the best way to augment daemons that might benefit from it with a readiness protocol," he wrote.
"It bothers me on some philosophical level that so much functionality that I'd like to keep conceptually separate from an init system is being pulled in to the systemd upstream. And as someone who has spent much of my professional career working with non-x86 systems and who has worked with many non-Linux kernels in different contexts, I've found the anti-portability rhetoric from Lennart (Poettering, the main systemd developer), et al, particularly grating."
Packard said he had considered technical excellence, support for the Debian community and support for other Linux communities in coming to his conclusion.
"Because of the central nature of pid 1, and influenced by experiences like that expressed by Marc Merlin, I believe that Debian will need to support multiple init systems going forward, even on Linux," he wrote.
Merlin, a Google server sysadmim and software engineer, recently presented a talk in which he spoke about how Google had upgraded all its production servers to a modern Linux system based on Debian from an ancient one.
Packard added: "However, on Linux, I believe that the vast majority of Debian users would be best served by encouraging them to use systemd by making that the default.
"systemd is being developed by a broad cross-distribution community who are solving long-standing technical issues with how subsystems are managed within the Linux environment. Yes, there are technical issues with using systemd in a Debian environment, but I don't see any of them as significant blockers, and only by contributing our expertise can we expect them to be resolved in the best way.
"In contrast, upstart has a developer community limited to Canonical employees and others who are able and willing to sign the onerous CLA associated with that software. I believe as a result, upstart development has flagged and now lags far behind systemd in several key areas."
The next Debian release, Jessie, is scheduled for November this year.