Home Business IT Open Source FSF dismisses Microsoft security pledge as 'meaningless'

The Free Software Foundation has dismissed Microsoft's announcement of a new offer to protect its customer data from government snooping, calling it "meaningless".

In a statement, FSF executive director John Sullivan said the company had made renewed security promises in the past as well.

He was referring to a Microsoft announcement last week that it would be expanding encryption for its products in the wake of the revelations that America's National Security Agency has been conducting blanket surveillance of many countries. Microsoft and several other big technology outfits have also been exposed as co-operating with the NSA.

Sullivan pointed out that proprietary software like Windows was fundamentally insecure, not because of Microsoft's privacy policies but because the code was hidden from users whose interests it was supposed to secure.

"A lock on your own house to which you do not have the master key is not a security system, it is a jail," he said.

Even on proprietary operating systems like Windows, Sullivan said it was advisable to use free software encryption programs such as GNU Privacy Guard.

"When no-one except Microsoft can see the operating system code underneath, or fix it when problems are discovered, it is impossible to have a true chain of trust," he said.

"If the NSA revelations have taught us anything, it is that journalists, governments, schools, advocacy organisations, companies, and individuals, must be using operating systems whose code can be reviewed and modified without Microsoft or any other third party's blessing. When we don't have that, back-doors and privacy violations are inevitable.

"While the Microsoft announcement does promise 'transparency' to reassure people that there are no back-doors in Windows, this is no solution. Transparency in the Windows world normally means self-reports commissioned by Microsoft, or access granted to outsiders covering very limited portions of source code under strict agreements that limit sharing that information."

Sullivan emphasised that freedom and security could not be guaranteed by just being allowed a peek at the code. "Microsoft has demonstrated time and time again that its definition of a 'back-door' will not be the same as yours. Noticing that the back-door is wide open will do you no good if you are forbidden from shutting it," he said.

"The solution after Microsoft's announcement is the same as it was before its announcement. Just like Microsoft's former chief privacy adviser, switch to a free software operating system like GNU/Linux, and don't look back," he said.


Does your remote support strategy keep you and your CEO awake at night?

Today’s remote support solutions offer much more than just remote control for PCs. Their functional footprint is expanding to include support for more devices and richer analytics for trend analysis and supervisor dashboards.

It is imperative that service executives acquaint themselves with the new features and capabilities being introduced by leading remote support platforms and find ways to leverage the capabilities beyond technical support.

Field services, education services, professional services, and managed services are all increasing adoption of these tools to boost productivity and avoid on-site visits.

Which product is easiest to deploy, has the best maintenance mode capabilities, the best mobile access and custom reporting, dynamic thresholds setting, and enhanced discovery capabilities?

To find out all you need to know about using remote support to improve your bottom line, download this FREE Whitepaper.


Sam Varghese

website statistics

A professional journalist with decades of experience, Sam for nine years used DOS and then Windows, which led him to start experimenting with GNU/Linux in 1998. Since then he has written widely about the use of both free and open source software, and the people behind the code. His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.