If you believe that technology could be bridging the generation gap, think again. According to Deloitte’s first State of the Media report it’s as stark as ever.
One of the reasons why netbooks have proved so successful is the inclusion of Linux to lower resource requirements and cost alike. So why has Apricot decided to drop Linux and only offer a Windows XP powered netbook instead?
Earlier this week we were reporting on how one of the best
known British computer brands had risen phoenix-like from the ashes of
1999 to launch a very 2008 product: a netbook.
Apricot Computers has repositioned itself as a
manufacturer of "ultra mobile personal computers" and launched the
Picobook Pro. At the time I found it hard to bring myself to be excited
by just another netbook to land in an already crowded market.
What a netbook needs to succeed these days is something different,
something that makes it stand out from the crowd, something that gives
it that 'X' factor no less. It seems that I spoke too soon regarding
the Picobook Pro for it now has that something: no Linux.
Yes, in a move that provides more of a 'What The XXXX' factor than anything else, it would appear that
the SuSE Linux powered version of the netbook is axed already. The
Register
suggests that the reason is, rather incredibly, that Linux is "too
complicated."
An Apricot mouthpiece told El Reg that "The Linux version proved too
complicated with initial testers, who would opt to purchase and install
XP any way." Surely some mistake, as users of just about every other
Linux driven netbook on the market have managed OK.
The clue lies in something else the Apricot man said, namely that it
has decided to offer just Windows XP because "as soon as it is switched
on, it is ready for use." Aha, all becomes clear. What Apricot means is
that it could not manage to get the Picobook Pro out to customers with
Linux ready to roll in any usable fashion.
Surely that is more of an Apricot failing than a Linux one? It is hard
not to accept that a modicum of work at the Apricot end would have
resulted in a Linux OS that is just as user friendly as a Windows XP
one out of the box. After all, every other netbook manufacturer that I
can think of has a Linux version and the Internet is not awash with
complaints about installation.
Of course, choosing SuSE Linux Enterprise Edition might have had
something to do with it, what's wrong with a Ubuntu variant or one of
the many dumbed-down-distros just crying out for netbook use?
The only good news, for Windows XP fans, is that the Apricot netbook
with XP will now cost UKP £29 less. Mind you, that's still a whole £20
more than the Linux version would have been...