Davey Winder
Sunday, 26 October 2008 15:50
Business IT -
Networking
Page 2 of 2
There was more bad news from the IWF survey, not least
that 77 percent of UK adult Internet users who have stumbled across
these images of children being sexually abused actually have no idea
what to do about it.
Yet 71 percent say that the availability of such
paedophile fodder online is their top Internet related concern.
Obviously more needs to be done to balance these figures, more needs to
be done to ensure the public know how to properly and safely report
such filth.
Peter Robbins OBE, the IWF Chief Executive, agrees: "Internet consumers
should know that if they do stumble across these images then it's vital
to report them to the IWF; we have
international partnerships in place to get these
websites removed."
It isn't that the IWF is not having an impact upon child porn as
initiatives like the voluntary blocking in the UK of child sexual abuse
websites by online companies are helping to reduce inadvertent access
to content hosted abroad. In 2007 there was a 10 percent decrease in
confirmed websites depicting child sexual abuse.
Yet only 27 percent of those surveyed knew that this dynamic blocking
takes place, while 94 percent think unrestricted access to all content
on the Internet is important. In actual fact, 95 percent of the UK
population with residential broadband connections are protected this
way.
Other statistics to come from this report include the disturbing news
that 50 percent of all child sexual abuse websites known to IWF depict
the most brutal and severe levels of abuse, with the IWF identifying
2755 overseas 'core' child sexual abuse websites last year alone.
Message to UK users: if you discover child sexual abuse content online,
please report it to the IWF www.iwf.org.uk while being aware that UK
law protects your right to report such content without being labelled a
paedophile yourself. The IWF does warn, however, that "anyone taking it
upon themselves to seek out or investigate this kind of material where
there is no legitimate duty to do so will be liable to prosecution."